Take your paper, for example. You have the right to publish it even though it contributes to the littering of Atlanta's environment. If sued over your contribution to the pollution in this city, would you voluntarily agree to publish fewer copies or to publish only electronic copies when not required to do so by law? This is what Duke Energy did. Duke's Murray County plant was legally authorized to emit certain amounts of pollution, and Duke Energy was forced to protect its legal right to do so when Duke was sued by several environmental groups.
Notwithstanding the fact that Duke was legally authorized to emit certain levels of pollution, however, Duke voluntarily agreed to undertake efforts to reduce those legally authorized emissions at not only the Murray County plant but at the Sandersville plant as well. Thus, your article should have applauded the voluntary actions of Duke Energy to reduce its emissions to levels lower than authorized by law and by the Georgia EPD.
Your article also mentions my representation of the city of Richmond Hill, but again your article is misfocused and is also misinformed. Geological tests do not show that drilling into the Lower Floridan Aquifer would cause saltwater to jeopardize coastal Georgia's main water source. In fact, geological tests show that drilling into the Lower Floridan Aquifer in Richmond Hill will have no impact on saltwater intrusion. This is not the important point to be gleaned from this litigation, however. Richmond Hill has sought a permit to withdraw groundwater from the Lower Floridan Aquifer because EPD has refused to fulfill its legal obligation to give priority to the provision of water for public water supply purposes and to reallocate groundwater that is not being used by other users.
EPD has issued permits to numerous industrial users in southeast coastal Georgia for quantities of groundwater far in excess of the amount actually being used by these industries. Rather than reallocating this unused groundwater to cities like Richmond Hill that need the water for public supply purposes, EPD encouraged Richmond Hill to seek a permit to withdraw groundwater from the Lower Floridan Aquifer and is now championing legislation that would force cities like Richmond Hill to pay industries to relinquish their unused permitted capacities. Richmond Hill would be more than happy to forgo the cost of having to withdraw groundwater from the Lower Floridan Aquifer and instead increase its withdrawals from the Upper Floridan Aquifer if only EPD would fulfill its legal obligation to reallocate unused Upper Floridan Aquifer water. Thus, your article should have chided EPD, rather than Richmond Hill.
-- Barbara Gallo, Atlanta
Editor's note: It's a stretch to characterize Duke Energy's agreement to reduce the planned pollution from its Northwest Georgia plant as "voluntary." At the time, the utility's permit was being challenged by the Georgia Center for Law in the Public Interest. Duke agreed to reduced pollution levels as part of a settlement agreement with the center.
In Richmond Hill's case, Gallo alludes to a limited and much-criticized state study, which found that drawing water from the Lower Floridan Aquifer wouldn't have a "significant effect" on the Upper Floridan Aquifer. Georgia Southern University geology professor James Reichard says anyone would be "way out on a limb scientifically" to conclude from that study that drilling the lower aquifer wouldn't result in salt water flowing into the upper aquifer. "Basic science" says that if you draw water from a lower aquifer, some water from the upper aquifer will drop into the lower aquifer. And, close to the coast, saltwater is likely to fill the void in the upper aquifer. The question is how much. "That is what we don't have firm data on, and no one has that data, and for anyone to make definitive statements either way, they are misleading," Reichard says. The state has authorized a more conclusive, $14 million study to be completed in 2005. But Gallo's efforts sought to gain Richmond Hill its permit before that study is completed.
Dangers of the unknown
Comments attributed to me in "Less than meets the eye" (News & Views) appearing in the April 16 Creative Loafing were both distorted and taken out of context.
The article indicates that I said it is "important not to get too carried away with incidents like Goocher's shooting" referring to a Georgia State University student who was shot during an attempted robbery near the campus.
I was not asked anything about this off-campus student shooting, nor did any of my comments specifically refer to it. Anytime anybody, student or not, on campus or not, is shot and critically injured, it is a very serious situation. I would never try to downplay any crime, let alone one of this severity.
In general comments not referring at all to this crime, I did indicate that the types of crime faced in urban environments are often better-known threats than those on-campus crimes committed by fellow students. This makes no crime less serious than another, but merely makes the point that sometimes unknown dangers can pose an additional threat.
Mr. Goocher has our best wishes for a speedy recovery, and I want to personally make it clear to him and his family that we take this incident very seriously.
-- S. Daniel Carter, Senior Vice President,Security On Campus Inc., Knoxville
John Sugg: I read your article in the Loaf pertaining to the presidential election (Fishwrapper, "Truth in exile," April 9). I had to wonder that in the middle of a war that's been successful from the standpoint of the U.S. and the Iraqi people that you are still whining about the election. I thought liberals were "progressive," "forward" thinkers. Ring, ring ... that's the sound of the alarm clock. It's the year 2003 and George Bush is the president. Oh yeah, and Mr. Van Winkle, we won the war and the Iraqi people did greet our heroic military with flowers and joy! Sorry to disrupt your pessimism, but it looks like conservatism wins, liberalism loses.
-- Scott Hanna, Acworth
Knowing what it's like
It is tragic to hear about Gretchen ("Girl disconnected," April 2) but I am really happy that you guys published the story. Personally, I have experience with the illness because I have a family member with the disease and another member suffering the result of it.
For a large part of my life, I have had to live through it, and I do understand what everyone has been through with her. Unfortunately for anyone involved, there is no easy answer and support is hard to find. I am really glad that there was such a large article about this so others can understand and maybe be more understanding of the illness.
-- April Withers, Atlanta
I read Gretchen Hupfel's obituary in the AJC last December and I was intrigued to know more about her. Thanks to your article, my wish came true ("Girl disconnected," April 2). What an incredibly sad story about a truly brilliant artist plagued by a terrible disease. I was extremely touched by her giving to her favorite charity on the day she died.
The information you revealed on schizophrenia has helped me better understand it although it appears to perplex even the experts. I'm so glad you were able to make this a front-page story for someone who deserved recognition.
-- John Porter, Cumming
Thanks for everything
As a student at Georgia Tech, the only news I ever got was from quick and easy sources like CNN and Fox News. So as the week goes by, I become increasingly pro-war, pro-Bush. I'd almost say I'm a full-fledged right-winger by the time Saturday rolls around. But then, on Sundays, I read Creative Loafing while I'm at work. I read it cover to cover, including the great ads for things like vaginal rejuvenation. More importantly, I read things like Fishwrapper, which takes all the opinions I'd created during the week and discredits them, one by one. Especially since I'm a foreigner, it makes me want to kick Dubya in the nuts. Thank you for keeping my political views in check.
Also during the week, feelings of being a complete failure overpower me because I fail a thermodynamics test (or something along those lines). Then, Sunday rolls around and I read about Gretchen Hupfel ("Girl disconnected," April 2). There is a person with incredible work ethic, a work ethic I wish I had. Her tale is an incredible, sad story -- and it reminds me that there are more important things in life than a stupid test.
Once again, on Monday, at my 8 a.m. history class, I begin to curse the existence of non-technical classes, for making me read and do other such "non-important" work. What can I say? I'm an engineer in training. Then along comes Sunday, and I read Hollis Gillespie's column, and I always enjoy it so much that I realize that writing is truly a fantastic art. A once-aspiring writer myself, reading her article makes me wonder how I ever stopped caring about transcending thought and feeling.
So, in short, thank you for bringing perspective back into my life.
-- Alexandra Taylor, Atlanta
""She admitted that she was drinking and driving,' attorney Jackie Patterson told reporters following her…
I thought Ted had "commented" on the development shortly after it happened, although the response…
My cat thinks he's a mountain lion.
Fulton County State Court Judge Susan Edlein was a litigation partner at Holland & Knight…
The Coming Medicaid Cost Explosion http://bit.ly/glp4mz