The skinny on Richardson’s divorce

House Speaker Glenn Richardson has been criticized for having his divorce decree sealed from public view, but that censure is somewhat misplaced. That’s because the speaker is not actually divorced — or at least wasn’t when the court documents were sealed.

The explanation we heard from a knowledgeable House member is that the documents in question do, indeed, relate to divorce proceedings. But the Richardsons’ divorce has not yet been finalized.

It’s not uncommon for parents to ask a judge to seal divorce proceedings in order to protect their children, as may have been the Speaker’s objective. But rather than take his chances at persuading a randomly assigned judge — as you or I would have to do — Richardson apparently used his clout to steer his case to a former law partner who was inclined to give him a friendly ruling.

In legal circles, that’s called “judge shopping” and while it may not be, strictly speaking, illegal, it would certainly be considered an ethical violation on the part of both the shopper (Richardson) and the shoppee (Paulding Superior Court Judge Jim Osborne).

It will be interesting to see the result of a motion filed by ethics watchdog George Anderson claiming that the Richardsons’ file was improperly sealed. Even if a court sides with Anderson — and, to us, this seems a no-brainer — the case would likely be reassigned to a new judge who could well decide to keep the documents under seal.

Inquiring minds may have to wait a while longer to inspect the Speaker’s dirty laundry.