Showing 1-3 of 3
I suppose that was sarcasm you are using against Murdoch? Isn't your "newspaper" in bankruptcy? How about actually analyzing an idea instead of breaking out the sarcasm every time? Your blog like a carpenter whose only tool is a hammer. The WSJ is one of the few newspapers doing well and they have a mixed subscription/free content model. They deliver content that people are willing to pay for. Not all information is equal in quality. I think he knows what he is talking about.
NC, FL, GA and AL, along with MI, were in the top 5 for drops in unemployment claims. So we've got that going for us.
@cep Yea, you're right... that's why it won't work for everyone. The WSJ is mostly read by financial news junkies who have way more money than I would ever have, and surely don't mind paying a subscription fee. And if you don't believe me, the Financial Times also seems to be doing quite well online... but, remember that NYTimes pay-wall? yea... Besides, do you really think the New York Post stands a chance in this model? Three letters: TMZ. But if they can pump out more of these, maybe they'll stand a chance. A blanket pay-per wall is not innovative and it won't work for everyone. And not to nitpick, but it's our parent company that filed for bankruptcy, not the paper.