Mayor Shirley Franklin called a press conference today to discuss city finances, then, as soon as it began, told reporters, "There won't be any big news here."
Great. And I had to stop watching a video of kittens riding a Roomba for this?
As it was, the mayor and Atlanta Chief Financial Officer Jim "I Don't Need This Job" Glass discussed a range of topics in the service of, as Shirley said, "fiscal transparency." Here's a short list:
The city has issued $58 million in tax-anticipation notes, a form of short-term bond designed to float city operations while it waits to collect taxes. The TANs are due to be paid off by Dec. 31, so the city is hoping the county gets its tax-bill-issuing butt in gear
Buried somewhere in all this were the July budget figures. Glass announced that city revenues had come in about $1 million lower than expected, but had bettered spending projections by close to $7 million.
It wasn't until after the conference that a city official reminded me of the significance of Glass' announcement. Only a year ago, when Atlanta was frantically slashing payroll to stave off a budget deficit, the city's woebegone finance department couldn't produce reliable annual budget figures forget about monthly. In terms of accounting practices and budget controls, it would seem that City Hall has made considerable progress.
Unless, of course, you ask Councilmember and mayoral hopeful Mary Norwood. Shortly after the mayor's presentation, Norwood put out a press release expressing outrage over what she called "another egregious case of financial mismanagement at City Hall."
It seems that a city employee neglected to make a timely payment to a city vendor, which resulted in an $80,000 fine the city is contractually obligated to pay. When Glass was asked about the snafu, he called the result of a "miscommunication" and said the employee had been punished.
But, as Norwood countered:
$80,000 isn't a miscommunication. It's a new Police Officer on the beat protecting your family and a raise for experienced officers so they stay in Atlanta instead of going out to the suburbs.
Norwood finished by asserting she would bring "better management and accountability."
But Norwood undercut her argument by citing, as an example of financial mismanagement by City Hall, the problems of the Atlanta Renewal Community Coordinating Responsible Authority (ACoRA). As the AJC recently reported, ACoRA will likely be forced to return about $30 million in federal grants. But Norwood apparently doesn't grasp or is being intentionally misleading that the ACoRA program is a free-standing entity with an independent board (hence the title "authority"); City Hall has no say in how those grants are doled out.
If Norwood is that confused about who runs what programs, I'm not sure how she intends to effect better accountability.
Showing 1-9 of 9
It is good that Mary Norwood wants better financial management in Atlanta. I would like to know: 1. When did Mary Norwood first know that the City's financial practices were unacceptable and what has Mary specifically done since then to improve the City's practices? 2. If Mary Norwood did not know of the Citys financial issues at an early point in her eight years on City Council, why not?
Concerned, Woolard and Borders, the two council presidents while Mary has served, both kept her off the important committees and did not let her chair any. This may be Mary's strongest claim to outsider status. She asked more questions and threatened the insider games in a way that get-along Howard and go-along Claire never would. But Mary was also ineffectual. She often doesn't know what she's talking about, or can't make up her mind what will sell best in her 8 year run for mayor.
Now I am curious why Lisa Borders kept Mary Norwood off important committees. Rivals? Concern about effectiveness? Mayor Franklin's opinion? Something else?
Scott, I was watching that same video! Cute little buggers. Norwood's confusion is hardly surprising. I've been to a few of the debates, and her default answers to questions she doesn't know is...well...that she doesn't know. But she's got a little kernel of information, so she'll squeeze on that until it pops. @Borders on the ridiculous: How do you know this info about Norwood as it relates to Borders and Woolard? Either you're a campaign staffer or stretching this article information like salt water taffy. I do agree with you about Norwood being ineffectual. The poor dear. @Concerned Citizen: Are you the same as "Concerned Atlantan" on AJC's Political Insider? All this concern on a Friday...loosen up -- it's the weekend!
Amnesia, Membership and chairmanship of council committees are among the few things that are public info! Mary used to chatter away to just about anyone, including me. She recounted how Woolard was dismissive of her on her own and Shirley's behalf. Motives are not provable, of course.
It's "amnesty" darling, not amnesia. A general pardon granted by a government, especially for political offenses. (Yeah, I got it from the Internet.) Thanks for the public info bit. Doesn't change my opinion though.
Will someone from Mary Norwood's campaign please pretend to be a private citizen and answer the questions I raised in my first post?
Concerned, you're not asking a mayoral campaign to do something unethical, surely? You could submit your question to one of the candidate forums. But do try to be even-handed. Each of the candidates provides ample material for derision.