Pin It

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Be careful what you wish for, Newt edition

Posted by Scott Henry on Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:51 PM

Screen_shot_2012-01-03_at_6.35.45_PM.png
  • Restore Our Future
While we're awaiting the results of the Iowa GOP caucuses, may I direct your attention to a great article that ran in the NYT over the weekend. It was about how the Mitt Romney campaign had spent $3 million in recent weeks on TV ads hammering Newt Gingrich.

Not the official Romney campaign, mind you, but the shadow Romney campaign that operates under the name Restore Our Future. It's what folks call a "super PAC" because, unlike a candidate's official campaign that can only accept $2,500 from an individual donor per election cycle, these monstrosities can accept unlimited donations from anyone — and spend just as lavishly on sliming political targets. The group's unceasing ads are largely credited with Gingrich's crashing poll numbers.

It's all in the name of free speech, of course, and when the U.S. Supreme Court made it all possible in last year's Citizens United ruling, most conservatives cheered the advancement in corporate rights.

Few were cheering louder than the former House speaker, who's a big booster of the conservative advocacy group (which repaid the solid by producing his straight-to-video screed-umentary, America at Risk). Before the landmark court ruling came down, he was quoted thusly:

"Ever since McCain-Feingold was enacted in 2002, Citizens United has been on the front lines of the battle against it. After seven years of fighting, we are now just one decision away from knocking down a huge section of law that restricts our right to free speech. Please join Citizens United and me in our fight for the First Amendment rights of every American."

Now that Romney is successfully using this egregious campaign-finance loophole to tear him a new Iowa cornhole, I wonder if Newt still feels the same way.

Now, in case you want lighter fare, please enjoy, courtesy of McSweeney's, Newt Gingrich’s letter to Virginia, regarding the existence of Santa Claus and claims that he said otherwise.

Tags: , ,

Comments (1)

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

That McSweeney's link is genius.

report   
Posted by CL_Eric Celeste on 01/03/2012 at 8:18 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Latest in Fresh Loaf

More by Author

Search Events

Search Fresh Loaf

Recent Comments

www.flickr.com
items in Creative Loafing Atlanta More in Creative Loafing Atlanta pool

© 2012 Creative Loafing Atlanta
Powered by Foundation