Thursday, August 21, 2008

Called out

Posted by Besha Rodell on Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM

Last week in my review of Vine, I made a comment about the restaurant's wine list regarding origin and diversity:

The menu, room and list all look to California for inspiration, but all three would do well to take a big step beyond the West Coast. With 400 wines on the list, I'd like to see more variation in origin rather than a few nods toward the Old World in a sea of California wines.

It appears my generalization was incorrect. I got an email from Chris Reid, Vine's sommelier, which corrected me. He took the time to break down the wine list and found this:

Total counts by percentage are... California 37%, non-California domestic 12%, imported wine is 55%! The majority is IMPORT.

Obviously, I should have paid more attention. My methodology was horribly flawed, and revealed one of my shortcomings: I tend to pay more attention to one part of a wine list than others: full-bodied whites. That's no justification for the misinformation printed in the review, and to Reid and Vine I apologize. There's no excuse for generalizations like this that misinform the public - I am fully aware of the impact a review can have, and I take the responsibility seriously.

With that said, it was difficult for me to find a white wine at Vine that I really wanted to drink. That's partly because of my own tastes, something I usually try to keep under wraps in a review. But it's one of my restaurant peeves when the list is so heavy on Californian chardonnays and has nothing French, or the few French chardonnays on the list are prohibitively expensive (as is the case at Vine). I'd like to see restaurants that specialize in wine give as much space to French and Italian whites (beyond pinot grigios) as they do to California whites.

It's true that Vine has some serious geographic variety, offering wines from India, South Africa, Argentina and beyond. I never had the pleasure of speaking with Reid during my visits, and if I had, perhaps he could have directed me to a wine I could get excited about. As it is, I am very sorry for the error.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

37 + 12 + 55 = 104 percent. I wonder if someone enjoyed a glass or two during the production of those numbers.

report   
Posted by statistician on August 21, 2008 at 11:31 PM

Maybe he's double counting blends! Ha-ha!

report   
Posted by Ivan on August 22, 2008 at 12:08 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Latest in Omnivore

Author Archives

Search Events

Search Omnivore

Recent Comments

  • Re: What gives with Fig Jam?

    • wow that picture looks awful. one, it's sausage and peppers, not tomatoes. two, it's the…

    • on February 12, 2012
  • Re: Cheap Eats: Fuoco di Napoli

    • I thought this place was very disappointing, an obvious copy of the much, much better…

    • on February 12, 2012
  • Re: What gives with Fig Jam?

    • Doctor: if you had a pizza that looked like it was from a high school…

    • on February 12, 2012
  • Re: What gives with Fig Jam?

    • i was excited to try Fig Jam, mostly because the space looks fun, but I…

    • on February 12, 2012
  • Re: The Atlanta sushi void

    • RuSan is the Tweety Bird tee-shirt of sushi restaurants.

    • on February 12, 2012
  • Re: The Atlanta sushi void

    • For not-expensive sushi, I like Hashiguchi Jr. in Buckhead and Kang Nam on Buford Hwy.

    • on February 11, 2012
  • More »
www.flickr.com
items in Creative Loafing Atlanta More in Creative Loafing Atlanta pool

© 2012 Creative Loafing Atlanta