In 1974, Georgia Power broke ground on nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle near Augusta, embarking on a nuclear odyssey that would nearly bankrupt the company.
Almost 15 years later and after several delays and environmental hurdles the project's construction costs ballooned from $680 million to a staggering $8.4 billion. And it wasnt until then that Georgia Power could begin to recoup the cost from ratepayers.
Now, as the state's largest utility moves forward on two new reactors at Plant Vogtle estimated at $6.4 billion, the first in nearly 30 years, the company wants to cover its assets and it's enlisted the assistance of a phalanx of lobbyists and a controversial legislative plan of attack.
Introduced by state Sen. Don Balfour, R-Snellville, Senate Bill 31 would allow Georgia Power to begin charging customers you and me in advance for two new proposed nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle. The bill passed the state Senate last week and now moves to the House.
That's a huge diversion from the typical process. In past decades, Georgia Power sought state approval before building a plant, built it on its own dime, and then recouped the cost by raising customers' rates.
According to Georgia Power, residential energy bills would rise $1.30 per month beginning in 2011. The following year, the average customer would see bills increase by $2.60 a month. By 2017, the average customer would pay an additional $9 a month nearly $108 a year.
The bill has consumer advocates, Democrats and even some Republicans crying foul. Georgia Power, a private company that operates as a regulated monopoly in the state, is asking customers, not shareholders, to shoulder the risk of a whats basically a business investment that has the potential to once again balloon in cost.
Balfour, who says he was presented the concept last fall by utility executives, claims it would save ratepayers $300 million in the long run by allowing Georgia Power to avoid interest payments and would prevent a rate shock to customers when the reactors start producing energy.
"I think it's a win-win-win," Balfour says. "I think it's great for Georgia. I don't see any losers in it."
But consumer advocates and some Democrats call the bill misleading, unfair, and the wrong solution at the wrong time.
Consummate consumer-advocate guru Clark Howard blasted the bill, saying the utility was "trying to pick your and my pocket." Libertarian blogger Jason Pye branded Balfours legislation as "Georgia Power's poison bill."
"It's a bad, big-government bill that's forcing consumers to prioritize Georgia Power's debt and financial obligations over our own," says Beth Malone, a spokesperson for consumer advocacy group Georgia Watch.
Another part of the bill that might piss off consumers: Big business is exempt from the rate hike a group that, unlike you, me and small-business owners, enjoys the service of lobbyists. After language was written into the bill that exempted big business from the rate hike, the groups lobbyists have been noticeably absent from the debate.
But perhaps the most serious problem with the bill is that the Georgia Public Service Commission a body better prepared to handle such issues is already considering the exact same fix.
The commission, the state agency that decides how much you pay to heat your home or turn on your lights, is staffed by a team of experts in energy issues and financing. Those experts have raised questions over whether future consumers of Plant Vogtle's newly generated energy would be spared the expense incurred by current ratepayers.
Or, as Sen. David Adelman, D-Decatur warned his colleagues: "It is a bad idea to inject yourself into this system, substitute your judgment for that of five statewide elected officials, force them to engage in piecemeal ratemaking, and to do so without the background, without the special knowledge, and without hearing any debate."
The Public Service Commission is supposed to rule on the issue in 30 days.
It doesn't really belong in the General Assembly, says Malone of Georgia Watch.
Balfour's response to that argument speaks to the power-grabbing move of his legislation: The commission, he says, was created by the General Assembly, and lawmakers have the authority to issue it directives.
But eleventh-hour changes to the bill allow the commission to retain a measure of control, Balfour points out.
The PSC still decides what rate of return Georgia Power gets on a rate of return," he says. "The PSC still decides whether they build this plant. And they can disallow any expense they think is not prudent."
Critics hope Balfours bill will face additional scrutiny in the House. Two House committees were scheduled to discuss the legislation on Wednesday and Friday.
If passed, the bill would need Gov. Sonny Perdue's signature. Last week, the governor released an update about the state's energy plan that emphasizes the expansion of Plant Vogtle. Add to the equation that Perdues chief of staff is a former Georgia Power executive, and you can rest assured hes keeping tabs on the bills progress.
Additional reporting by Scott Henry.
(Photo by Christina Wedge)
@Mark Perhaps you should dig into the text a little more instead of posting memes,…
"Voltaire (who is probably better defined as a pre/Enlightenment writer not philosopher)" _____________________________________________________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nSKkwzwdW4…
"If we are talking about the political thinkers and and philosophers which influenced the formation…
Mark in your typical ham-fisted mode of debating you fail to see other's points. How…
Further the phrase "... and a republican form of government" already makes it clear that…
Also his statement included "... and a republican form of government" which is why I…